Ethereum L2 Nasty Community’s lead developer at Coinbase, Jesse Pollak, has spoken out in opposition to exchanges charging projects to salvage listed on the platform. In his idea, Binance’s play-to-play mannequin is costly and extractive compared to Coinbase’s Nasty community.
Coinbase’s Nasty promotes delivery and developer-pleasant ecosystem
For context, Binance costs as high as 3% for airdrops and one other 3% later. He contrasts this with Coinbase’s straightforward invitation to appropriate approach and “construct something considerable on Nasty.” This implies that projects enact no longer incur any impress to be listed on Coinbase.
It reveals that the trade, in incompatibility to Binance, prioritizes developer innovation over charges. This is able to presumably even be its contribution to bettering and supporting projects within the crypto house.
It will serene impress 0% to be listed on an trade. https://t.co/KBt1o74Bs9
— jesse.deplorable.eth (@jessepollak) October 14, 2025
Pollak maintained that since Coinbase does no longer demand token airdrops, list charges and good deposits, different exchanges can possess to serene enact the same. “It will serene impress 0% to be listed on an trade,” he wrote.
Essentially, Pollak believes that the aim of every trade desires to be to wait on developers to construct worthwhile products on the community. This is able to presumably even be carried out by offering extra delivery, builder-pleasant platforms, appropriate admire Nasty’s permissionless and low-impress mannequin.
If list isn’t any longer reserved appropriate for those who pays, Pollak believes it can presumably also help the sphere to grow faster.
Community split over Pollak’s plight on trade charges
The fetch community has given blended reactions to Pollak’s plight. A user, Crypto Bitlord, vital that list entails impress, and Binance became no longer doing anything else horrible by charging capability projects.
“On the sphere, what number of cash has Coinbase listed this year?” he queried.
One other user opined that whereas free list sounds gigantic, it became appropriate a ploy by some exchanges to duvet compliance, security and liquidity setup. He talked about that zero charges weren’t constantly sustainable.
Cognac, on his fragment, acknowledged Binance as a leading centralized trade, but its red tape and list charges depend as a blueprint back. He applauded Coinbase for offering every mission in their ecosystem with free list, as such cash saved may maybe presumably even be channeled into constructing one other mission.
With ultra-bullish projections for Bitcoin and the market, exchanges with the finest alignment may maybe presumably also snatch a bigger share within the long bustle.
