Congress is cracking down on AI-powered scams with bipartisan legislation that will ship fraudsters to jail for many years after brazen impersonation assaults centered The US’s top officers.
The AI Fraud Deterrence Act, presented by Win. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Win. Neal Dunn (R-FL) on Tuesday, would raise maximum fines to $2 million and lengthen jail sentences up to 30 years for financial institution fraud dedicated with AI assistance, in accordance with a Tuesday observation.
Ecstatic to introduce the AI Fraud Deterrence Act at the sleek time with @DrNealDunnFL2, which would lengthen penalties for AI scams and deepfakes, alongside with impersonations of federal officers.
Our bipartisan fair is easy: Deter of us from the use of AI to commit fraud. pic.twitter.com/ixUe854KRV
— Win. Ted Lieu (@RepTedLieu) November 25, 2025
The legislation targets wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and impersonation of federal officers.
“AI has lowered the barrier of entry for scammers, which is able to beget devastating results,” Lieu mentioned in the observation, warning that impersonations of U.S. officers “would possibly per chance well presumably moreover moreover be disastrous for our nationwide security.”
AI fraud escalating
The bill comes after scammers used AI about a months support to breach White Home Chief of Group Susie Wiles’s cell phone, impersonating her relate in calls to senators, governors, commercial leaders, and diversified high-level contacts.
Two months later, fraudsters mimicked Secretary of Philosophize Marco Rubio’s relate in calls to three foreign ministers, a member of Congress, and a governor in an obvious strive and set sensitive data and fable access, in accordance with the bill.
The bill adopts the 2020 National AI Initiative Act’s definition of AI and carves out First Modification protections, exempting satire, parody, and diversified expressive makes use of that encompass a obvious disclosure of inauthenticity.
AI-aided mail and wire fraud would elevate up to twenty years and a $1 million in fines, with long-established penalties rising to $2 million. AI-pushed financial institution fraud would possibly per chance well presumably moreover plot 30 years and a $2 million penalty.
AI-assisted money laundering would elevate up to twenty years in jail and fines of $1 million or three instances the transaction ticket, and AI impersonation of federal officers would bring three years and a $1 million penalty.
“AI is advancing at a rapidly dash, and our laws settle on to preserve dash with it,” Dunn well-known, cautioning that after criminals use AI to grab identities or defraud American citizens, “the penalties ought to be severe ample to envision the crime.”
Within the period in-between, President Trump is reportedly weighing an executive uncover to dismantle reveal AI laws and relate federal primacy, even as extra than 200 reveal lawmakers bustle Congress to reject Home Republicans’ push to fold an AI-preemption clause into the protection bill.
A an identical moratorium collapsed in July after a Ninety nine–1 Senate vote, and opposition has since widened, even supposing a draft uncover circulating remaining week exhibits the White Home inflamed by its bear path to override reveal solutions.
Proving AI use in court
Mohith Agadi, co-founding father of Provenance AI, an AI agent and truth-checking SaaS backed by Fact Protocol, told Decrypt that the bipartisan nature of this bill components to a rising consensus that “AI-pushed impersonation and fraud demand pressing action.”
“The true anguish is proving in court that AI modified into used,” Agadi mentioned. “Synthetic voice material would possibly per chance well presumably moreover moreover be refined to attribute, and existing forensic instruments are inconsistent.”
“Lawmakers ought to pair these penalties with investments in digital forensics and provenance programs like C2PA that clearly document a voice material’s foundation,” he well-known, or else we risk increasing laws which can per chance presumably be “conceptually solid however practically no longer easy to enforce.”
